Amelia Zylberman vs Natalie Barbir Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zylberman vs Barbir analysis and find out who is favored!
Amelia Zylberman vs Natalie Barbir Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Zylberman 1 - 0 Barbir
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zylberman has won 34.44% of points on his second serve, while Barbir has won 37.1%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zylberman, in recent form, has won 61.31% of his opponent's second serve points, while Barbir has won 57.43%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.41% and 30.21% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zylberman has saved 48.72% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Barbir has saved 38.81% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zylberman has won 46.15% of matches played (W/L 6/ 7), with Barbir winning 23.81% (W/L 5/ 16) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zylberman has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 5/ 5), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4). Barbir has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 3/ 6), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Zylberman has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 40% of matches (W/L 4/ 6), where as Barbir has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 25% of matches (W/L 3/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Zylberman winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Zylberman winning 2 and Barbir winning 1. The last match between Zylberman and Barbir was at the W35 Mildura, 12-03-2024, First, Grass with Amelia Zylberman getting the victory 7-6(7) 4-6 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 3:25:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Zylberman and Barbir have played a deciding set 1 times, with Zylberman winning 1 times and Barbir 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Zylberman winning 1, and Barbir 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zylberman has played against opponents with an average rank of 118.54 while Barbir has played against players with an average rank of 27.81.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zylberman has won 100% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Barbir has won 20% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zylberman has converted 52.24% of breakpoint opportunities, and Barbir has converted 39.06% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Amelia Zylberman
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
17
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
1
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
34
Age
Plays
Natalie Barbir
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
Form
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
47% (8-9)
Career Total W/L
22% (35-126)
29% (2-5)
YTD W/L
11% (1-8)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Amelia Zylberman | Natalie Barbir |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 17 | 16 |
Aces (Total) | 1 | 4 |
DFs (Total) | 18 | 6 |
Avg Match Time | 3:25:0 | 3:25:0 |
1st Serve % | 50% (62/123) | 66% (78/119) |
1st Serve Win% | 71% (44/62) | 59% (46/78) |
2nd Serve Win% | 34% (21/61) | 34% (14/41) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (8/14) | 40% (8/20) |
Return Points W% | 50% (59/119) | 47% (58/123) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-6(7) 4-6 6-4 |
Amelia Zylberman
Player
Natalie Barbir
50%
(
62 of
123)
1st Serve %
66%
(
78 of
119)
1
Aces
4
18
Double Faults
6
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
46 of
78)
34%
(
21 of
61)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
14 of
41)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
47%
(
58 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
59 of
119)
124
Total Points Won
118
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Amelia Zylberman | Natalie Barbir |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 29% (2/5) | 11% (1/8) |
Sets Win/Loss | 27% (4/11) | 20% (4/16) |
Games Win/Loss | 37% (48/81) | 37% (69/118) |
Hard Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/2) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 20% (1/4) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/2) |
Aces pg | 0.03 | 0.07 |
Aces Total | 2 | 6 |
DFs per game | 0.69 | 0.22 |
DFs Total | 43 | 20 |
Avg Match Time | 1:6:34 | 1:4:13 |
Avg Opp Rank | 220.14 | 64.89 |
1st Serve % | 50% (156/310) | 64% (232/360) |
1st Serve W% | 55% (86/156) | 58% (135/232) |
2nd Serve W% | 31% (48/154) | 38% (49/128) |
BPs Won% Total | 52% (13/25) | 33% (13/39) |
Return Pts W% | 40% (120/298) | 38% (148/389) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 29% (2/5) | 0% (0/4) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 20% (1/4) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 29% (2/7) | 11% (1/9) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 67% (2/3) |
Deciding Set W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/2) |
1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (5/0) | 0% (8/0) |
Amelia Zylberman Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Maddison Inglis
Player
Amelia Zylberman
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
50%
(
21 of
42)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Tina Nadine Smith
Player
Amelia Zylberman
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
6 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
40 of
66)
65
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Amelia Zylberman
Player
Natalie Barbir
50%
(
62 of
123)
1st Serve %
66%
(
78 of
119)
1
Aces
4
18
Double Faults
6
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
46 of
78)
34%
(
21 of
61)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
14 of
41)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
47%
(
58 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
59 of
119)
124
Total Points Won
118
|
7-6(7) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF |
Georgiana Ruhrig
Player
Amelia Zylberman
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
33%
(
13 of
39)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
10
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
23%
(
3 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
5 of
26)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
43%
(
20 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
77%
(
30 of
39)
57
Total Points Won
29
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Alana Parnaby
Player
Amelia Zylberman
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
43%
(
17 of
40)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Yui Chikaraishi
Player
Amelia Zylberman
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve %
49%
(
23 of
47)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
5 of
24)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
24%
(
7 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
22
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Amelia Zylberman
Player
Jelena Cvijanovic
48%
(
26 of
54)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
3
Aces
1
11
Double Faults
6
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
48%
(
26 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Amelia Zylberman
Player
Katie Oliver
52%
(
55 of
106)
1st Serve %
61%
(
49 of
80)
0
Aces
4
12
Double Faults
2
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
43%
(
22 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
51%
(
54 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
40 of
80)
92
Total Points Won
94
|
7-6(3) 4-6 14-12 | H2H |
view more
Natalie Barbir Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Anastasia Piangerelli
Player
Natalie Barbir
54%
(
25 of
46)
1st Serve %
74%
(
29 of
39)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Natalia Pietras
Player
Natalie Barbir
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Bridget Mihulka
Player
Natalie Barbir
56%
(
74 of
131)
1st Serve %
61%
(
63 of
103)
6
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
4
64%
(
47 of
74)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
49%
(
28 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
43%
(
56 of
131)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
48 of
103)
123
Total Points Won
111
|
6-3 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Amelia Zylberman
Player
Natalie Barbir
50%
(
62 of
123)
1st Serve %
66%
(
78 of
119)
1
Aces
4
18
Double Faults
6
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
46 of
78)
34%
(
21 of
61)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
14 of
41)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
47%
(
58 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
59 of
119)
124
Total Points Won
118
|
7-6(7) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Ena Shibahara
Player
Natalie Barbir
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve %
74%
(
29 of
39)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
51
Total Points Won
21
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Natalie Barbir
Player
Bianca Compuesto
82%
(
49 of
60)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
64)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
9 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(1) 4-0 ret. | H2H |
view more